Support The Happy Political Action Committee https://HermeticaPublic.com/Shop or Get in Touch (above or below).
Happy Political Action Committee
9 Independence Way
Hazlet, NJ 07730
We’re running a candidate or three in 2028. Anyone running in 2026, 2027, or 2028 is invited to contact us. We’re focused on the USA in the year 2300. We’re bringing the country together without compromising your values. This is not a uniparty. This is not force. This is not Globalism. This is not “enlightened centrism”.
You will be more free to be and act as you like than ever before, with no one and nothing left out.
We’re seeking guidance, volunteers, people already committed to running anywhere in the USA, people who want to learn fundraising, people to make small donations, people to make small monthly donations, space owners to hold events, lawyers, accountants, bankers, investors, etc. How else would you like to support?
We do not claim to know everything. We’ve just been extremely humble for a long time, and will continue to be. We have 26 unique proposals, that we’ve counted so far, nobody is discussing these ideas yet. The incentives for donations are unprecedented, unheard of, you’ll be astounded. Ask us what you get when you donate.
Spending from fundraising is 100% transparent, in an account of your choice. Over 81% of funds will be going directly to the cause. Most money won’t be spent until Spring 2027. Prior to 2027, we will only be paying fundraisers (1% – 19%), and costs of incentives of the donor’s choice. Ideally, there’s dividends, depending on the political climate. For example, we maybe able to make these 26 proposals happen for under a million, there’s a way to do all this for under $300k, including winning the house, the senate, and executive, and cause judges to operate with integrity. It can really be done via word of mouth for free, myself and fundraisers just need money to live, that’s it, and we’re generating donors at only 19% max. Funds raised, the 81%+ goes towards education and marketing. Both positive advertising like the inspiring ideas, and reality advertising; amplifying top clips from independent media that poke all the holes in the old ideas that no longer work.
We’re putting integrity into government, and it’s purely a positive phenomena.
You’ve never seen anything like this.
We are planning for seven generations in the future. We may never have an unenlightened president ever again. The sitting President is welcome to become enlightened anytime. What will your seventh great grandkids will have wanted us to consider?
At your service 24/7,
Lee
Lee Tyler
Director
Happy Political Action Committee | Hermetica Public
917.282.6285
This is only a sliver of our plans for the federal government after the 2028 election.
There’s no name for this brand of politics yet, we’ll leave that to the history books. Both parties will probably end up transforming. Something like ethical capitalism, capitalism with integrity, personal responsibility, putting integrity into government, empowering states, congress, policing, the justice department, and the executive branch to be happy in their own lives. Then, we can all make great use of the taxpayer dollars. If you’re not happy with your own family and community, how are you making and executing laws? Do you know how you can make a difference even in the face of no agreement as a private citizen? We’ll communicate the ways.
Clipped from a speech from the 80’s? 70’s? Search “Heart of the Matter” on this site.
“We’ve really had a really remarkable breakthrough recently in this work. What amounts to a major breakthrough the possibility of the value of the work, and it’s impact on the effectiveness of living and on the quality of life for people. I recognize as I go through these periods in this work where things become very creative and new possibilities open up that I owe a great deal to a lot of people. The opportunity for this work I mean really being able to do it at all, is a product of an enormous about of support from a lot of people.
The work is possible out of those interactions. and relationships, and the actions people take with their lives. Kind of like, keeping their neck stuck out, living at risk, so to speak. The set up isn’t so, good when I stand on a platform and speak because it looks like a lecture or a talk or something like that. and I wanted to be clear about the nature of the evening tonight. The nature of this evening is really within the nature of an inquiry. We’re going to use the three and a half hours we’ll spend together to inquire into certain issues and the issues into which I’d like to inquire are not the issues with which we’re ordinarily concerned. In the normal course of events we have this everyday way being in the world. We have these everyday concerns, our relationships, our health, our work, our jobs, our finances, our children, and their lives, our friends, and their lives, the world, the nation. Tonight’s an inquiry into something which underlies all of that, something underneath those concerns which we have which I’ll call our everyday concerns. Those concerns about our everyday way of being in the world. We want to inquire tonight into issues which are literally at the heart of the matter of being human. These are issues with which we’re not normally engaged on an everday basis. Hopefully we’ve taken some time from time to time to engage in those issues, maybe we read a book at night about those issues, maybe spend a few hours during the week engaged in those issues about what lies at the heart of the matter for human beings. For the most part our everyday lives are not about that. So tonight is going to be a bit of a strain on you, given that I’m going to be asking you to kind of change your pace. The way in which we’re engaged with life on an everyday basis. On a daily concerns basis is not quite the appropriate mode for an inquiry into these issues which lie at the heart of the matter for human beings”. We’re going to take a look tonight like a very serious look. Like an inquiry.
Like asking the question what type of being is a human being? We all kind of take it for granted. It’s like air to the bird or water to the fish. We kind of take it for granted, we kind of don’t give much real thought to it. Not that we have don’t have opinions about it. And not that we haven’t been told something about it. And not that we don’t have certain beliefs about it. We very rarely stop and question just what kind of a being is a human being. So, tonight, that’s kind of the general question, what kind of a being is a human being and I suggest to you that certain things will come up that maybe difficult, that this is not an easy inquiry. There are not pad answers for this. And as a matter of fact, some of the answers, some of the honest answers, some of the honest possibilities about that question are somewhat uncomfortable. So in addition to actually having to work tonight to kind of have to be up on the edge of your seat with these issues, some of it may be a bit uncomfortable.
In addition to the question what kind of a being is a human being, we want to then go on if we can get some place engaged in that question, engaged with that issue we want to go on a bit from there and whatever opens up for us out of that inquiry to inquire into the possibility of being for human being. We kind of take that one for granted as well. Those questions may not seem very exciting at first glance, because they don’t have anything to do with looking good for the most part.
I’m promising and I want to be very clear about this promise. That the inquiry tonight and the work tonight is not some esoteric matter that has nothing to do with our everyday way being in the world, with our everyday concerns, but rather we’re doing this inquiry for it’s practical value. For the impact that it can have on our everyday being in the world on our everyday concerns. So we have a very strange situation. We’re going to be dealing with those issues that lie at the heart of the matter for human beings. Those fundamental issues about being for human beings and we’re going to engage in this inquiry for a specific purpose and purpose is for the impact that it can have on our everyday concerns on our everyday being in the world.
Now, in the beginning you may not see any relationship between this inquiry and for instance your relationships with your children. You may not see any correlation between this inquiry and your concerns at work or for your concerns in your relationships or your social concerns or your concerns for the world, I’m promising that there is a relationship.
These issues that we’re going to be addressing are ancient issues. I didn’t invent them. And the people with whom I work didn’t invent them nor did you invent them. They’ve been around for a very very long time, they’re old questions. They’re questions that came along with being human, they’re questions along with our civilization.
What we did invent, and what we’re going, working with tonight, is a way of getting at these questions so I want to be clear that while these questions have been discussed by many different disciplines of humanity, that the method for tonight. The discipline that will be using tonight is one that we invented and I’ll tell you why we invented it, and what it’s supposed to do. So the questions are ancient and the method of inquiry, the discipline, which we will be using to get at those questions is one that we invented for this occasion. The method is distinct, new and exciting.
What it’s not…
It’s not a philosophy, although you’ll hear some of the concerns with philosophy in the questions that we’re asking tonight. It’s not religion or theology, although you’ll hear some of the concerns of religion and theology in the questions that we’re asking tonight. It’s not many other disciplines like sociology or anthropology. So the question about being that we’re asking this engagement with the fundamental questions, the fundamental issues for human beings about their own being. What kind of a being is a human being? What is the possibility of being for human-beings Is not a question that we want to ask in a philosophical domain, we don’t want to ask it in a psychological domain. So tonight is not about psychology or a psychological approach to these questions. It’s not anthropological, nor is it historical. We’re not trying to get at the being of human beings from a historical domain. 9:43 We’re not trying to get our being from the perspective of ourselves as individuals, from ourselves as a collective, from ourselves as society, but rather we want to get at these questions about being in the domain of being so this is an inquiry into being in the domain of being, these distinctions are a discipline for dealing with being in the domain of being such that it’s not designed to produce answers. That may sound very strange. You say you ask a question and it doesn’t produce an answer. It’s not designed to produce solutions. It’s not designed to give people a prescription for living. It’s not designed to produce a recipe for getting the things in life that you want. As it says here the work is not about solutions or answers, it’s an inquiry into the nature of being. In the process of this inquiry, insights show up that profoundly impact the quality of our lives, so that’s the nature of these distinctions. This particular way of getting at these questions does not produce answers, it does not produce solutions, it does not produce recipes, it does not produce prescriptions. What happens is that certain insights occur, even though you don’t get answers, certain insights occur in the process of this inquiry using the invention of these distinctions to get at these questions and certain insights will show up for you, now insights don’t show up necessarily show up like “Oh, I see something I didn’t see before, because that would be kind of like an answer, the insights show up rather than like that as actual openings or a space for being or a freedom or an empowerment in your everyday being in the world?” End of speech quoted here, hear and read the full speech by searching “heart of the matter” on this website (below).
You will be more free to be and act how you want than ever before.
Long Term Debt Stabilization

Maybe not Double, but 2.1, stable birth rates without force or coercion.

Birth rate to 2.1



Below is on Capitalism and Society. Do you want more? Get In Touch with Us (Above or Below) for more on the following…



